Table 2 Predictors of the decision not to cut youngest daughter
Predictors | 95% C.I of OR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
ORadj | Lower | Upper | |
State | |||
Gedaref (ref) | |||
Khartoum | 0.588* | .0.351 | .0.983 |
Area of residence | |||
Urban (ref) | |||
Rural | 0.702 | 0.420 | 1.172 |
Mother’s level of education | |||
None (ref) | |||
Khalwa (religious school) | 1.821 | 0.652 | 5.090 |
Primary/elementary | 1.360 | 0.625 | 2.962 |
Secondary | 3.04* | 1.356 | 6.847 |
University/post graduate | 3.15* | 1.269 | 7.824 |
Perceived wealth status | |||
High (ref) | |||
Medium | 1.112 | 0.328 | 3.768 |
Low | 0.457 | 0.116 | 1.805 |
Mother’s FGM/C status | |||
Circumcised (ref) | |||
Not circumcised | 2.12* | 1.091 | 4.118 |
Exposure to any pro-FGM/C campaign, information or materials? | |||
No (ref) | |||
Yes | 0.503* | 0.304 | 0.831 |
Exposure to any anti-FGM/C campaign, information or materials? | |||
No (ref) | |||
Yes | 2.63* | 1.200 | 5.779 |
Exposure to any anti or pro-FGM campaign, information or materials? | |||
No (ref) | |||
Yes | 1.07 | 0.364 | 3.195 |